Why Gov. Kelly should reject Kansas’s anti-tax bill

A minority of voters shouldn’t have veto power over local officials elected by the broader community.

By

Columnists

March 31, 2026 - 3:35 PM

A new Kansas law provides an avenue for 10 percent of recent voters to overturn a city's planned increases. Photo by Tim Carpenter/Kansas Reflector

Everybody hates property taxes. But Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly should still veto — quickly — a new anti-tax bill that legislative Republicans just sent to her desk. 

It’s an anti-democratic bill. One that would, if it becomes law, put a bare minority of voters in control of local decisions about taxing, spending and public services.

Here’s how it works: The legislation would let voters sign a protest petition if their local governments — school districts, city and county governments — exceed their previous year’s budget by more than 3%. Which probably sounds great to a lot of homeowners struggling to keep up with inflation. 

Understandable. 

But there’s a problematic part: If just 10% of those local voters sign the petition then the budget “shall be deemed disapproved” and the local government has to cut the budget back to the 3% inflation cap.

That’s it. No vote by the broader community. No majority approval. 

Instead: One out of every 10 of your neighbors will have veto power over your local government’s spending decisions — even if, hypothetically, those spending decisions are supported by 90% of your neighbors. All you need is a few signatures. 

“This bill finally puts taxpayers in control,” Kansas House Speaker Dan Hawkins said in a news release. 

He’s only partly right. The bill puts a tiny few taxpayers in control. 

In all likelihood, it gives the most reactionary anti-government folks among us inordinate leverage over the services the rest of us receive.

Accountability to community

It’s a recipe for chaos. 

“In many cities the size of mine, you will always find 10% of people who will vote against the city budget,” Rep. Rui Xu, D-Westwood, told the Kansas Reflector when an early version of the bill passed the Kansas House last month. 

He’s right. Xu attempted to raise the bar to 20% — his amendment failed — but that’s probably still too low. 

A minority of voters shouldn’t have veto power over local officials elected by the broader community. We elect city councils and county commissions and school boards to do the day-to-day gritty work of balancing a community’s tax revenues against its needs, after all. 

These folks aren’t unaware that Kansans are angry about their property taxes — they have jobs, go to church, shop in their grocery stores just like you do and I promise they hear about this stuff all the time, relentlessly — but they also have to make sure that the roads get paved, the trash gets picked up and that the classrooms have teachers. It’s tricky.

Related
April 28, 2026
May 7, 2019
April 4, 2019
February 11, 2019